Feb
2

Ethics of Photoshop

By lauren  //  Art, Photoshop  //  4 Comments

Photoshop is a powerful tool for photo editing. It gives you the ability to make wonder works of art and edit you own photos. However, this software also allows people for unethical, deceitful, and even illegal use.

Unehtical

The photo to the left is my attempt at retouching a  photo of myself (for lack of a better subject haha). Don’t  the two look different? I don’t think I’m a bad looking gal  but I must admit that the second one does look better.  What do you think?

What is considered unethical use of  Photoshop? Well  ethics is a controversial topic – what may be unethical to  one person, would be ethical to another. Would is be  ethical for check personal email or facebook while at  work? Ethics are based on what a person finds right or  wrong. But what are some ways Photoshop can be used  in unethical ways?

The Photoshop Effect is a series on Youtube about  retouching in magazines. How much is too much? Tim  Lynch, the photographer and retoucher interviewed  in The Photoshop Effect Pt 1, says  that magazines often just assume that readers already  know that the photos in the magazines are retouched.

Think about it:

  • Should magazines have a disclaimer saying that the photos are retouched?
  • Is it right that magazines retouch their photos to a point of impossible perfection?

You can view the first part of the interview here.

Illegal

More then half the users of Photoshop is illegal! Most people download the program or find product keys online. But how can the program itself be used for illegal use? Well it’s simple, people can pass other people’s photos and artworks as their own. Any signature or watermark on a photo can be removed with a well experienced Photoshoper.

With Hurricanes At Thirty Year Low, Gore Turns To Photoshop 191109top4 Deceitful

This rolls the ethics of Photoshop and the legal aspect together.      Some examples of false representation using Photoshop was back  when Lance Armstrong was on the cover of Outside magazine back in  2010. Mr. Armstrong posed for the cover  but then the logo “38 BFD”  was advertised on his shirt. It was added via Photoshop and Lance  wasn’t happy about it. Here is the full article.

Not impressed? Well try this example of deceitful Photoshop use:  back in 2009, to prove his theory of global warming, Mr. Al Gore  turned to Photoshop to “enhance” a photo to make people believe  more hurricanes were occurring throughout the world. That’s pretty  dishonest if you ask me! You can check out the full article here.

I love using Photoshop! And I’d like to think that I’m pretty good at figuring out the tools to edit images for myself or for whoever requests something. However, giving credit is crucial! Like if you use stock photos in a photo manipulation, say where to from whom you got each photo from. It doesn’t make you any less of an artist for using someone else’s photos, especially if that person uploads them specifically for other people to use!

Remember: Use you Photoshop powers for good, not evil!

4 Comments to “Ethics of Photoshop”

  • Interesting read. That is pretty lame, what they did with Lance Armstrong. If they thought he would wear the logo, they would have just asked. Obviously they knew he wouldn’t want to do it, so they forced it on him. Regarding the Hurricanes, whether you believe in his cause or not, Al Gore is just shooting himself in the foot by using deceitful tactics that are so easily disprovable.

    If I just saw the ‘After’ photo, I wouldn’t have guessed it was manipulated, but it still looks ‘fake in the sense that people who go for that look are covering themselves up anyway. Maybe society is asking for that, but I prefer the more natural look and so do most of the people I know.

    Interesting topic!

  • Thanks for the comment! I don’t remember if I mentioned in the post or not, but this was a question brought up in a discussion in my ITs class. I’m glad you found it interesting.

    Lance Armstrong was pretty upset that they put the logo on him without his knowing. Weather or not he would’ve said yes or no, they shouldn’t have put the logo on him and Al Gore certainly wasn’t thinking when he did the photos with the hurricanes.

    I’m glad you would’ve thought the manipulated photo looked real! I didn’t think my photo retouching skills were all that good! haha But yeah, along with what you said, a lot of people do like the natural look and many of the ‘before’ photos for magazines look fine. I’ve seen videos on Youtube of people doing photo retouches and a lot of the comments said that the girl that was being retouched, for example, looked beautiful even before the retouch.

    Thanks again for the comment! ^.^

  • Pleasant page, I genuinely benefited from glossing over it, keep doing all the hard efforts.

  • Thank you =)

Leave a comment

CommentLuv badge

Slideshow

Help a college student out!

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline